AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8892/004
1 Department of pharmaceutics, Unity college of pharmcy, India.
2 Department os pharmaceutics,Browns College of pharmacy, Khammam, India.
*Corresponding Author: Swathi chilukala, Department of pharmaceutics, Unity college of pharmcy, India.
Citation: Swathi chilukala, Saritha Garrepalli (2017) Abuelas were successful and the results suggest a trend towards mothers limiting their children's LNSCI, J. Psychology and mental Health Care, 1(1); DOI: 10.31579/2637-8892/004
Copyright: © 2017 Swathi chilukala. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 02 March 2017 | Accepted: 14 March 2017 | Published: 30 March 2017
Keywords: hispanic; abuela; childhood obesity; mothers; simple carbohydrates
Background: Mexican-American children have the highest rates of childhood obesity of any ethnic group [1]. Because Mexican-American mothers follow the advice of abuelas (respected grandmothers in the Mexican-American community) more than that of health care providers [2], this pilot study evaluated the efficacy of using abuelas to deliver a motivational interviewing intervention to encourage Mexican-American mothers to limit their children's low-nutritive simple carbohydrate intake. Specific questions were whether or not 1) abuelas could deliver a motivational interviewing intervention, 2) abuelas could recruit and retain participants, and 3) mothers altered their attitudes/beliefs, perceived norms, perceived behavioral control (self-efficacy), intent and behavior of limiting their children's low-nutritive simple carbohydrate intake.
Methods: Two abuelas were recruited and trained to deliver a motivational interviewing intervention. The abuelas recruited 6 mothers to participate in the study. Assessments and interventions occurred at baseline and 1 month. Attitude/beliefs, perceived norm and perceived behavioral control (self-efficacy) were measured using sub-scales of the Healthy Diet Survey [3], intent was measured using an Intent Questionnaire, and behavioral change was assessed using a short-form food frequency questionnaire. A Wilcoxon test (α=0.05) was used to evaluate changes in responses between baseline and 1 month.
Results: The abuelas were successfully trained in motivational interviewing and reliably delivered the intervention. The abuelas recruited 6 mothers and all 6 participated through the entire study. All mothers felt it was important to limit their children's' low-nutritive simple carbohydrate intake (M=9.83, SD=.408) and scored their readiness to change as highly or extremely likely. Confidence in their ability to limit their children's low-nutritive simple carbohydrate intake increased (z=-2.041, p=.041) between baseline (M=6.33, SD=1.97) and 1 month (M=9.67, SD=.82) for 5 of the mothers. The sixth scored her confidence as 10 (the maximum) at both assessments. Responses to the food frequency questionnaire suggest a trend towards limiting their children's low-nutritive simple carbohydrate intake.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that recruitment, retention, and program delivery using abuelas were successful and the results suggest a trend towards mothers limiting their children's low-nutritive simple carbohydrates.
Introduction
Mexican-American children have the highest rates of childhood obesity of any ethnicity (more than 38%), with children age 2-6 years having almost twice the rate of obesity (17%) of white children (9.1%) [1]. Rural areas in this country have higher rates of obesity than urban areas [4]. This study was conducted in a rural mid-western area that is approximately 40% Mexican- American with an overweight prevalence among children of 31.5% [5]. Children who are obese are at higher risk for adult obesity and its co-morbidities including hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, joint disorders, psychological disorders, hyperlipidemia, cancers, and asthma [1]. Obese children consume on average three times the cost of health care resources as a normal-weight child [6]. The national cost of childhood obesity is estimated at approximately 11 billion dollars for children with private insurance and 3 billion dollars for those with Medicaid. Children diagnosed with obesity are two to three times more likely to be hospitalized. Obese children are far more likely to be diagnosed with mental health disorders than non-obese children [6]. These facts support the need for obesity prevention and treatment interventions during early childhood.
Obesity is a complex multifaceted disease with multiple factors that contribute to or promote greater than expected weight gain in childhood. Limiting LNSCI in young children has been associated with lower rates of childhood obesity [7]. Low-nutritive simple carbohydrate foods are those foods that contain high proportions of simple sugars [8]. These foods are rapidly digested and absorbed, resulting in rapid peaks in blood glucose and insulin followed by a trough in blood glucose which results in increased perceptions of hunger. Commonly these foods have little nutritional value [8]. Examples include processed and homemade foods made with white flour, sugar, and corn syrup such as white bread, tortillas, pastas, candies, sweetened beverages, fruit juices/drinks and sodas. Foods with high sugar content have been shown to contribute to the increasing prevalence of obesity in children [9]. Brekke reported a positive relationship between one year old children who had a high intake of LNSCI and child obesity [9]. Starc [10] reported that high dietary intake of LNSCI is associated with lower HDL-cholesterol concentrations that are an important coronary risk factor and should be considered in diet planning for children [11]. It is important to recognize that in both children and adults obesity is strongly related to increased triglycerides and low HDL cholesterol [12]. Therefore, limiting LNSCI is likely to decrease the risk of developing childhood obesity. Also notable is the relationship between mothers' weight or body mass index (BMI) and child's weight or BMI. Several studies have confirmed this positive relationship in Mexican-American populations [13-16]. Mothers' eating and feeding behaviors have been positively associated as well [17]. Therefore, it is important to understand the mothers' role in contributing to and preventing obesity, and to include the mother in interventions to solve childhood obesity.
Pre-school children are primarily reliant upon an adult, usually their mother, for the quantity and selection of food available to them [18]. That mother/child relationships may affect childhood obesity is well documented in the literature, though there have been few studies examining Mexican-American mother/child eating behaviors. Children's disregulated energy intake has been positively correlated with mothers' disinhibition (inability to control food intake) [19,20]. Furthermore, Mexican-American mothers' dietary disinhibition has been associated with less healthy food choices for themselves and their children [21]. Restrictive parent-child feeding practices have been associated with higher child weight [22]. Clark recommends that parents offer healthy foods to their children (e.g., limiting LNSCI) and allow the child to decide how much to eat [18]. This approach promotes healthy eating and allows the child to self-regulate intake of healthy foods. Other than sugar sweetened beverages (e.g., soda), there is little literature on limiting low-nutritive simple carbohydrates to reduce or prevent the incidence of obesity. Literature on treating childhood obesity in rural America is also limited.
Given the difficulty of reversing obesity, it is preferable to prevent overweight/obesity from developing by intervening in early childhood [23-25]. Few interventions have targeted prevention and treatment of childhood obesity in preschool children [25-27]. Interventions involving Hispanic preschoolers are even more limited [28,29]. A number of interventions have been trialed to treat childhood obesity with limited effectiveness. Few have focused on influencing attitude/beliefs, perceived behavioral control (self-efficacy), perceived norms, intent and limiting LNSCI behaviors among Mexican-American populations. Nutrition education programs generally focus on information dissemination, but have had limited effect on behavior change [30,31]. Nutrition education programs alone, which suggest specific diets, may be expensive and the Mexican-American populations in most communities are often poverty stricken and lack access to outlets providing inexpensive, healthy foods [32].
There is a growing body of literature that supports use of culturally appropriate interventions to facilitate behavior change [33]. We propose that using abuelas to deliver a Motivational Interviewing (MI) intervention to encourage Mexican-American mothers to limit their children's LNSCI would be more effective at producing behavior changes than other strategies because Mexican-American mothers follow the advice of abuelas (respected grandmothers in the Mexican-American community) more than that of health care providers [2]. If employing abuelas to deliver the MI intervention helps Mexican-American mothers limit low-nutritive simple carbohydrate feeding behavior, it may help normalize their children's body composition and decrease their risks for childhood obesity and the associated co-morbidities.
This pilot study evaluated the efficacy of using abuelasto deliver a MI intervention, with the goal of positively changing Mexican-American mothers' attitudes/beliefs, perceived norms, perceived behavioral control (self-efficacy), intent to limit their children's LNSCI and actual behavior of limiting their children's LNSCI. MI is evidence-based and uses encouragement and non-confrontational methods to favorably change attitude/beliefs, perceived norms, perceived behavioral control (self-efficacy) and intent to change behavior [34]. This approach is client-centered, empowering individuals to establish their own realistic goals for behavior change. It has been used extensively to change dietary intake, diabetes self-care, and addiction behaviors and is hypothesized to be an effective strategy for improving other health behaviors [35-37].
This pilot study evaluated whether or not 1) abuelas could be successfully trained to deliver a MI intervention to limit LNSCI following an algorithm2) abuelas could successfully recruit and retain participants and 3) mothers altered their attitudes/beliefs, perceived norms, perceived behavioral control (self-efficacy), intent to limit their children's LNSCI and actual behavior of limiting their children's LNSCI.
The framework for this pilot study was adapted from the Predicting and Changing Behavior Theory (PCBT) [38]. PCBT proposes that the primary determinants of behavior influence intention to engage in a particular behavior. These determinants include attitudes/beliefs (an individual's perception toward a behavior), perceived norms (including social pressures within a culture or family), and perceived behavioral control (self-efficacy or an individual's belief about the ease or difficulty of performing a behavior). The PCBT has been used to predict behaviors such as weight loss, physical activity and self-efficacy for healthy eating in Mexican-American populations [39-42].
We determined the mothers' attitude/belief score by summing the responses to the attitudes/beliefs sub-scale of The Healthy Diet Survey [3]. Higher scores indicated stronger attitudes/beliefs supporting limiting LNSCI. The Cronbach's alpha (a measure of internal consistency) for this sub-scale was .80 with a test-retest stability of r=.81 over 2 months [3].
We determined the mothers' normative belief score by summing the responses to the normative belief sub-scale of The Healthy Diet Survey [3]. Higher scores indicated greater normative belief for limiting LNSCI. Cronbach's alpha for this sub-scale was .77 with test-retest stability of r=.80 over 2 months [3].
We determined the mothers' self-efficacy (perceived behavioral control) score by summing the responses to the control belief sub-scale of The Healthy Diet Survey [3]. Higher scores indicated greater belief in ability to limit LNSCI. Cronbach's alpha for this sub-scale was .73 with a test-retest stability of r=.76 over 2 months [3].
We measured the mothers' intent to limit their children's LNSCI using an intent question developed based on Fishbein& Ajzen's guidelines [38] and scored using a 7-point Likert scale.
We measured the mothers' behavior of limiting their children's LNSCIusing the short form Food Frequency Questionnaire [43] which we modified to include items unique to this population. Mothers reported how often during the past month they served each simple carbohydrate item listed based on a scale with 9 frequency ranges (never or <1>43]. We determined means and standard deviations for specific simple carbohydrate items from the FFQ.
Motivational interviewing intervention
Our MI intervention was designed to effect behavior change by using abuelas to perform the intervention (addressing perceived norm), sharing information on the benefits of limiting LNSCI (addressing attitude/beliefs), and providing support to increase perceived behavioral control by decreasing mothers' ambivalence and barriers (addressing self-efficacy), which will support intent to limit their children's LNSCI and actual behavior of limiting their children's LNSCI. The abuelas began the MI intervention by asking the mothers how they rate the importance of limiting LNSCI on a 0-10 scale. The second question was how the mothers rate their confidence in limiting LNSCI on a 0-10 scale. If mothers rated the importance of limiting LNSCI low during the MI intervention the abuelas provided them with information on the benefits of limiting LNSCI to reduce the child's risk of obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and numerous other co-morbidities associated with overweight. If mothers rated their confidence in limiting LNSCI as low during the MI intervention then the abuelas provided them with strategies to decrease barriers, such as a list of healthy snack food choices, stepped changes (3 sodas per day to 2 sodas and 1 water per day, etc.), and having the child help choose healthy foods at the store, to increase their confidence. To help increase perceived behavioral control (self-efficacy) for limiting LNSCI, the abuela asked them about their readiness to change and what would help them be more successful. We believe the combined influence of changes in attitude/beliefs, perceived norm, and perceived behavioral control (self-efficacy) will increase intent to limit LNSCI and behavior of limiting LNSCI in Mexican-American mothers receiving the MI intervention.
Abuela recruitment and training
We recruited 2 abuelas based on referrals from our network of community partners and trained them to provide the MI sessions using a 5-hour DVD that demonstrates Miller and Rollnick's [44] technique for assisting with behavioral change. After learning the basic MI technique from the DVD, the senior author (who is MI certified) trained the abuelas specifically to deliver a MI intervention to encourage mothers to limit their children's LNSCI. The abuelas participated in role playing practice sessions to develop their proficiency. They followed a written algorithm to ensure uniform implementation of the MI intervention throughout the study. Intervention sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and reviewed by the senior author to ensure the accuracy of the MI intervention.
Participant recruitment and retention
Relationships are critical when working with the Mexican- American community. Because of their connections within the community and their respected status, we utilized the abuelas to recruit potential participants. To maximize retention we ensured continuity in the abuela-mother relationships and scheduled interviews at the time most convenient for the participants (including weekends and evenings). Incentives (gift cards) were provided to participants at both intervention/assessment sessions to encourage participation for the duration of the study. Gift cards compensated participants for their time and could assist mothers in purchasing healthier foods. We used bilingual abuelas and provided all documents in both English and Spanish to accommodate language preferences. Culturally appropriate interactions were emphasized during each data collection using cultural norms of Mexican-American communication.
Informed consent
We obtained informed consent from both abuelas and mothers who chose to participate. No data was collected until informed consent was completed. The University of Nebraska Medical Center granted IRB approval for this study.
Assessments
Background information (e.g., age, gender, number of children, education level, income, marital status, years in US, history of family obesity) was collected at baseline only using a demographic questionnaire. All other variables were assessed at baseline and 1 month. Assessments were conducted prior to the delivery of the MI interventions. Attitude/beliefs, perceived norm and perceived behavioral control (self-efficacy) were measured using sub-scales of the Healthy Diet Survey [3], intent to limit LNSCI was measured using the Intent Questionnaire, and limiting LNSCI behavior was assessed using a short-form food frequency questionnaire. These questionnaires were used to determine changes in mothers' perceptions and behaviors regarding limiting their children's LNSCI.
Data analysis
A Wilcoxon test (α=0.05) was used to evaluate changes in the mothers' responses to the questionnaires between baseline and 1 month.
Although this pilot study was small, it included a diverse sample. Participating mothers ranged in age from 22 to 43, half were from the U.S. and half were from Mexico, education levels ranged from elementary school to an associate's degree, marital status included single, married or divorced, and annual income levels ranged from $10,000 to $39,000. All mothers were the primary person responsible for feeding their children. All mothers scored importance of limiting LNSCI for their children as a 9 or 10 (scale of 1-10) (M=9.83, SD=.408) and scored their readiness to change as either highly likely or extremely likely (Likert scale) during both the baseline and 1 month assessments. Confidence scores regarding ability to limit LNSCI for their children increased significantly (Wilcoxon test, z=-2.041, p=.041) between the baseline (M=6.33, SD=1.97) and 1 month (M=9.67, SD=.82) surveys for 5 of the 6 mothers. The sixth mother scored her confidence as 10 at both assessments and therefore could not increase her score. Though the sample size was a limitation to determining significance, results from the food frequency questionnaires suggest that mothers had reduced the amount of some simple carbohydrates they offered after only 1 month in the study (Table 1).
Table 1 : Means and (standard deviations) for simple carbohydrates showing the greatest change between the baseline and 1 month food frequency questionnaires (n=6).
This study demonstrated that recruitment, retention, and program delivery using abuelas were successful. Each abuela successfully recruited 3 mothers and all 6 mothers participated for the duration of the study. The abuelas were successfully trained in MI and reliably delivered the intervention following the algorithm. Results suggest a trend towards mothers limiting their children's LNSCI after just one month of participation.
The abuelas stated that they hope this study continues as they felt it was successful and they were so pleased to be a part of helping their community. Mothers also asked to have the study continue for themselves and others. One mother stated that according to her doctor's scale she lost 8 pounds and her overweight son lost 5 pounds during this one month study. In addition, after just one month of limiting LNSCI her doctor told her and her husband that their blood sugars were under control after years of uncontrolled diabetes.
This study was limited by its geographical area and restriction to a single ethnic group so that it may not be generalizable to other populations. This pilot study is also limited by its sample size, 2 abuelas and 6 mothers.
Although from a small sample, these results and participant comments support further evaluation of this approach on a larger scale to fully assess its effectiveness and determine statistical significance. This study demonstrated that recruitment, retention, and program delivery using abuelas were successful and the results suggest a trend towards mothers limiting their children's LNSCI after just one month of participation.
Both mothers and abuelas requested that the program be extended to reinforce the mothers' efforts to limit their children's LNSCI. Therefore, additional booster sessions should be considered. MI booster sessions have been effective when delivered as often as weekly and as infrequently as 2-3 month intervals [32,36,45,46].
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
